What would you recommend?
What are your recommendations in this situation?
A construction company has a team of six on site technicians that install mechanical equipment. One of the six recently quit complaining about being worked to much and that he had personality conflicts with his foreman. He calls the office after he quits to inform them that 3 of the remaining technicians are abusing drugs and alcohol while on the job sites. This of course would create a major safety hazard. The company has no other indications that substance abuse while on the job is occuring. There has been no noticable drop in productivity, safety, or customer satisfaction. While not wanting to take a risk that this abuse is happening, the company wonders if this is the story of a gruntled ex-employee who is looking for ways to retailate against former co-workers. The company does not have a random drug screen policy and is afraid that requiring the 3 technicians to take a drug screen would be seen as targeting. On top of this, they are afraid that the drug screens will come back positive and that they will lose 3 technicians during the busiest time of the season.
My recommendation is this: Even though they do not have a random drug screening policy (which should be drafted and enforced) they have reason to suspect possible substance abuse and are obligated to confirm or disprove the allegations. I would send the three to take a drug test and fully document the reasons behind the request. Do you guys agree?
As for their concern that they will lose employees during a busy time, what do you recommend they do?
Comments
You stated that you have no other suspicions of drug/alcohol abuse. Here is what I think I would do.