I refuse to open the Thread That Won't Die. I am organizing a boycott. Very simple, all you have to do is ignore that thread and not open it. Let Steaks and Frank have their fun over there.
I was just reading this morning that Obama will send more troops to Afghanistan because he doesn't think the Afghanis are doing enough to root out the terrorists. Huh? He and the others throw rocks at Bush for invading Iraq but he will invade an ally? Musharraf has been under pressure by some of the more radical elements in his country for being too closely tied to the US. Now Obama wants to push him over the edge.
I plead complete innocence. I have also boycotted and refused to open the old thread and I'm hurt to think Ray associates me with that socialistic behavior. The last one I read on there was Paul wanting to try for 1,500, and I refuse to participate!!! On the current subject, how do you think Hil and Obama are going to handle the Iraq war being won? They've said about as much bad about the war and our warfighters, and have done everything they can to ensure defeat. How will they spin it to take credit for a victory???
[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 08-01-07 AT 09:53AM (CST)[/font][br][br]Well, they'll have to kiss and make up sometime if he is to be her running mate.
Edit: The above reply was meant for Ritaanz, Steaks snuck in there while I went to get my lunch.
Steaks, are you calling Paul a socialist? I thought he was a communist.
The Dems do not want us to win this war. If the war is resolved before the next election, they lose. They hope and pray for the status quo so they can claim to come in on the white horses wearing the white hats and take credit for turning it around within 1 month of taking office. Why do you think this democratic congress is doing nothing? They don't dare do anything. Hillary would have Pelosi's hide if she did any more than she is doing.
It's also funny how much press Hil's cleavage received. It was a stunner for the media but as hard as she tried it didn't change her cold persona. And here's another question: how do the democrats keep saying they speak for the American people yet have the absolute lowest ratings of any Congress? I believe eyes are starting to open.
Do you think the cleavage thing was a conscious effort on Hil and her handlers to overcome the cold persona perception? I suspect she knew exactly the kind of reaction she would get and did it intentionally.
Back in the Frontier Days, when we traveled by covered wagon, there were men going from town to town selling all kinds of goods. One type of merchandise in particular was a special elixir that cured everything.
The Dems are passing this potion around as the concoction of the century. Back then we called them snake oil salesmen. Sounds like that's what we got today too.
I am so glad you started a thread about killing of that nasty thread! If you hadn't, I was going to. After all, didn't we all agree that 1000 posts was enough? It is so frustrating to wait for it to open too!
Unfortunately, I have a hard time NOT opening it when I see a new post. Like a little kid I am afraid I will miss something.
So. I hereby declare that I will NOT open that thread again NO MATTER WHAT!
So Nae, since it sounds like you were the last to check it, has there been anything interesting posted on the "condemned" thread? Ray, I agree the cleavage was intentional and they've juggled a lot of media miles out of it. It's kind of sad that we have to dig deep into news stories to finally get the real news.
Good question Steaks. Hmmmm. I don't remember so I guess it wasn't that important. I remember one of the posters was Frank, but I can't remember who else was involved. Obviously it wasn't that interesting (plus I'm over 50 and my brain works less and less as the day goes on).
Ok, you guys have talked about it so much, I had to look. The last 4 posts on "The Thread" were Frank, Dutch2 & jitrbug. Notice they are all three from Missouri.
Comments
On the current subject, how do you think Hil and Obama are going to handle the Iraq war being won? They've said about as much bad about the war and our warfighters, and have done everything they can to ensure defeat. How will they spin it to take credit for a victory???
Edit: The above reply was meant for Ritaanz, Steaks snuck in there while I went to get my lunch.
Steaks, are you calling Paul a socialist? I thought he was a communist.
The Dems do not want us to win this war. If the war is resolved before the next election, they lose. They hope and pray for the status quo so they can claim to come in on the white horses wearing the white hats and take credit for turning it around within 1 month of taking office. Why do you think this democratic congress is doing nothing? They don't dare do anything. Hillary would have Pelosi's hide if she did any more than she is doing.
The Dems are passing this potion around as the concoction of the century. Back then we called them snake oil salesmen. Sounds like that's what we got today too.
Ritaanz, I remember reading about covered wagons in the history books. It's nice to meet someone who remembers them personally.
I am so glad you started a thread about killing of that nasty thread! If you hadn't, I was going to. After all, didn't we all agree that 1000 posts was enough? It is so frustrating to wait for it to open too!
Unfortunately, I have a hard time NOT opening it when I see a new post. Like a little kid I am afraid I will miss something.
So. I hereby declare that I will NOT open that thread again NO MATTER WHAT!
I will NOT.
I will NOT.
I WILL NOT!!!!!
Not unless I can't help myself.
Ray, I agree the cleavage was intentional and they've juggled a lot of media miles out of it.
It's kind of sad that we have to dig deep into news stories to finally get the real news.
Nae
Is it really my memory, or were their remarks ...er...unremarkable?