Commuter/Telecommuter "Inequity"
sambu
23 Posts
We are a non-profit, non-governmental employer. We have an exempt employee who has submitted a "proposal" to negotiate with us regarding her 50-minute commute to work. She is proposing that employees who don't commute as far end up with a higher net pay than she does due to the mileage,time and maintenance expense of her vehicle. After many pages of graphics depicting several calculations, she has asked that the "inequity" be resolved by providing a commuting allowance, varied by how far the employee must travel. She is proposing that she change from a 30 hour week to a 37 1/2 hour week working one day at home (but taking on no additional work), and if inclement weather sets in while she's traveling to work, she is not "docked" leave time (which is against our policy) due to "hazardous duty." She is also asking that when DSL and/or cable is available in her area, that she be allowed to work from home (though our director has stated there is no need for a staff member in that area of the state). This BOGGLES my mind, and I was wondering what some of your experience/responses were to this PROPOSAL!!! Thanks so much ... HR never ceases to amaze me!
Comments
I have had many employees either leave or transfer to another one of our locations because it is "closer to home" or less of a commuting hassle.
Come on, we can't solve all of life's problems!
Next thing you know, we'll be doing their grocery shopping and dropping off dry cleaning!
Belive it or not, we do have a local dry cleaner who comes into our Main office twice per week to "pick-up and drop off" for our employees convenience. I'm trying to figure out how to have milk & bread available so employees don'aahve to make an extra stop on the way home. Does this make them happy? Not in this lifetime.............
FOR THE BENEFIT OF RITAANZ, CERTAINLY THIS IS NOT SERIOUS.