disability and pregnancy - Pre-ex??

My STD/LTD carrier has informed me that they cannot exclude pregancy from the pre-existing clause in our STD plan. I have been told that the underwriters stated that it is all or nothing - we cannot exclude pregnancy alone from our pre-ex clause. Our health insurance plan (and previous plans I have worked with) exclude pregnancy from pre-ex conditions?

They informed us that the alternative is to eliminate pre-ex conditions altogether. Honestly, this whole thing sounds fishy to me. What liabilities would eliminating pre-ex conditions from our plan open us up to?

Has anyone else heard of this and if so, what is the reason??

Thanks in advance.

Comments

  • 6 Comments sorted by Votes Date Added
  • I believe that there was a court case or legislation recently (in the last year or so) that found having pregnancy as a PreX is discriminatory toward women and it now cannot be excluded.
  • Yep. That sounds right to me.

    James Sokolowski
    Senior Editor
    M. Lee Smith Publishers
  • Isn't it also prohibited under HIPPA?

    Margaret Morford
    theHRedge
    615-371-8200
    [email]mmorford@mleesmith.com[/email]
    [url]http://www.thehredge.net[/url]
  • I have just received clarification about this.'

    HIPPA only prohibits this for medical insurance plans, not STD plans.

    The Pregnancy Act states that you cannot treat preganancy (and be discimnatory) nay harsher than any other illness, etc. Therefore it is ok to include in a pre-ex clause for a STD plan.

    Ethically, I dont agree but keeping it in a pre-ex clause is within compliance.
  • I'm a pregnant woman whose current employer is going into a merger before
    my baby is delivered. Concerns about losing my maternity leave prompted me
    to see an employment lawyer last month. He explained that if a short term
    disability plan covered any illness such as heart attack, etc., then it must
    also cover maternity. If the plan does not cover maternity, but does cover
    other illness/sickness, the employer is in violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act which is Federal law. He also further went on to explain
    that some states place further restrictions on employers as well. Based on
    his statements, I believe that the clarification that you've been given is
    incorrect. Please contact an employment attorney in your state.
  • Our plan does cover maternity leaves - we were not being discrimnatory towards pregnant women and were in compliance with the Pregnancy Act. However, if a woman joined the company while pregnant, she would have been subject to the pre-ex clause (the same as if she joined the company with an other pre-existing condition).

    In order to alleviate the confusion, the company has decided to not have a pre-existing condition clause on our STD plan and our carrier has agreed not to increase our rates until our renewal as a result.
Sign In or Register to comment.