Injured at work & not work related lawsuit question
nietra
134 Posts
Have any of you had an employee injured at work, had your work comp carrier determine it wasn't work related & denied and then had the employee sue?
I know the work comp carrier is responsible for everything from this point forward but I'm getting requests from attorneys for documents, etc (which I'm sending on to the work comp attorney for his advice as to what to send) and I'm just wondering how it turned out for you? How long before it was all resolved?
Just curious more then anything on what to expect.
Thanks
Nietra
I know the work comp carrier is responsible for everything from this point forward but I'm getting requests from attorneys for documents, etc (which I'm sending on to the work comp attorney for his advice as to what to send) and I'm just wondering how it turned out for you? How long before it was all resolved?
Just curious more then anything on what to expect.
Thanks
Nietra
Comments
As far as timeline, well, that's tough to predict. I can tell you that we just put the one to bed last week and the EE had been injured in June 2002. We got our a** handed to us by the judge, so we're appealing. Long story short, degenerative hip disease which neccesitated a full hip replacemement. As to causation, well, his honor felt thirty days in our plant did it. He fully ignored expert medical testimony which contradicted this.............Apparently he gets reversed quite often.
Good luck.
Gene
We have three going on right now where the (ex)employees claimed work-related and the carrier denied them. (1) employee claimed he hurt his foot at work but told the doctor he hurt it three weeks earlier. (2) employee claimed prior injury during a fall had caused her knee to hurt again nine months later but doctor says it's degenerative joint disease due to weighing 350 pounds with a 30 year history of knee problems. (3) employee is some sort of back brace, can't breathe, smokes four packs a day, was exposed to agent orange in '72 and claims he's sick because we removed his stool at his work station. All of these are in their second year. We have no interraction with their attorneys.
Number (1) only involves about $4000 but we are going to send a message that we are not an easy mark for this foolishness.
I know that I have very little to do from this point forward but just curious as to what to expect.
Thanks
nietra
A piece of advice: Lay off anything you can on the comp carrier. For example; when asked by your attorney to provide copies of any and all documents related to the injury or the subsequent claim or even the first report, tell him that the comp carrier is the custodian of all of those records. Let him get it from them. You pay the carrier for that too.
Disclaimer: This message is not intended to offend or attack. It is posted as personal opinion. If you find yourself offended or uncomfortable, email me and let me know why.
Maybe you won't ever be involved in the depositions. Maybe you will. And don't forget that that attorney is working for you. You can attend the depositions if you want to. It's a great experience.
Additionally, your witnesses will be more comfortable if they have a representative there from the employer. They are more relaxed if they receive prep for the deposition. I think it is very important for you to attend all you can, but you should absolutely attend the plaintiff and decision-maker's depositions. I think this also sends a message to the plaintiff and counsel that you are serious about litigation.
So get involved but remember (as The Don said) the attorney AND workers comp carrier work FOR you. You pay them, therefore, you tell them what to do. You ask for advice, but be aware that you are their bread-and-butter so make sure their not dragging out a procedure to earn more. Good Luck! Oh, a great spin off... your current employees will love you for defending their rights and not letting less than honest persons hurt "their" company.