ignoring of safety rules
Whatever
1,945 Posts
Yesterday, we had a very serious accident. The ee lost parts of two fingers, one on each hand. The ee had previously been warned and even had a suspension for ignoring safety rules. Yesterday's accident resulted from the ee removing the guard from the machine. The company rules state that only a mechanic may remove the guards and this after doing lockout-tagout. This is the reason the ee had previously been suspended. If he had not been injured, he would have been fired. However, I am concerned that this would look like retribution. Any suggestions
Comments
Good luck!!
The one thing I would do is make it clear, he is being terminated for violating your safety policy, end of discussion. But for his removing of the guard(s) he would be working for you. Also if you have a restricted duty policy I would discuss with your WC claim manager about stopping any TTD benefits once he would have been back on restricted duty. His violating the safety policy got him canned, if not for that he would be back on restricted duty. Often you can stop paying TTD if this is the case depending on state law. It is similar to those injured workers who get canned for attendance. If terminated for rules violations and not for getting injured, you can stop payment.
Review your past disciplinary actions related to similar offenses. Surely you have termed someone before who did something similar, but did not get hurt. This will go a long way towards supporting your case.
Don't be shy, it is also a good time to re-educate your employees about guarding issues and your policy. Don't specifically mention the employment action with this guy, focus on wanting to make sure this does not happen to anyone else!
My $0.02 worth.
DJ The Balloonman
I am curious.
DJ The Balloonman
He would have been better off just getting fired and not injured.
My $0.02 worth.
DJ The Balloonman