Profession Courtesy Question
![LindaS](http://blr-hrforums.elasticbeanstalk.com/plugins/DefaultAvatars/design/OrangeAvatar.jpg)
How would you handle the following situation....
At my husband's employer their HR department is staffed by one person. They are FMLA eligible but appear to have some issues with the administration.
For example, a friend of my husband's has what would be considered a "serious health condition" under the FMLA (migraines)and when he requested the FMLA paperwork he was told by the HR person that completing the forms did not mean that he would not be required to bring in a doctor's slip each time he was absent due to a migraine. When he informed the HR person that he thought completing the paperwork (as long as the need for leave was medically verified) would mean that he would NOT have to bring the doctor's slip in each time he was told that was not the case. The company does NOT require others to bring in a doctor's slip for each absence BTW.
Now this person is coming to me looking for guidance. I can provide the information I have but he is obviously very frustrated and is considering quitting because he is tired of all the "flack" he gets whenever he misses work.
Now I am somewhat friendly with the HR person at this company and would like to have some guidance on whether or not I should contact her and assist or should I just leave things alone and let the chips fall where they may?
Thanks for the help.
At my husband's employer their HR department is staffed by one person. They are FMLA eligible but appear to have some issues with the administration.
For example, a friend of my husband's has what would be considered a "serious health condition" under the FMLA (migraines)and when he requested the FMLA paperwork he was told by the HR person that completing the forms did not mean that he would not be required to bring in a doctor's slip each time he was absent due to a migraine. When he informed the HR person that he thought completing the paperwork (as long as the need for leave was medically verified) would mean that he would NOT have to bring the doctor's slip in each time he was told that was not the case. The company does NOT require others to bring in a doctor's slip for each absence BTW.
Now this person is coming to me looking for guidance. I can provide the information I have but he is obviously very frustrated and is considering quitting because he is tired of all the "flack" he gets whenever he misses work.
Now I am somewhat friendly with the HR person at this company and would like to have some guidance on whether or not I should contact her and assist or should I just leave things alone and let the chips fall where they may?
Thanks for the help.
Comments
Other than that stay out of it.
PORK
There are a couple of exceptions that involve a change in the circumstances, but for a chronic condition like migraines, those are probably infrequent.
The act basically allows you to request recertification no more frequently than every 30 days, and that is in connection with an event calling for leave.
So if the EE had a migraine once a week, the ER could not recertify until 30 days had gone by with the next migraine.
Refer your friend to 825.308 under the regs for the exact wording.
He can then return to his HR person and explain that the doctor's office was wondering why he needs to receive certification since the regulations (and this is time to point out which one) clearly states that this is not needed.
Thank you for that one, judicial system.
In any event, disciplining an EE under the protection of FML is a no-no and can carry severe fines and penalties.
"Whenever I start to feel blue, I start breathing again!"
I also understand you want all HR professionals to care as much as you do and are dismayed when you hear of situations in which it sounds like the HR person is not acting professionally or knowledgeably. But I think too easily good intentions can create big problems if you try to insert yourself into the situation.