Considering age . . . .
![System](http://blr-hrforums.elasticbeanstalk.com/plugins/DefaultAvatars/design/LBlueAvatar.jpg)
Let's say you have a labor intensive department like public works. The lifting requirement is 50 pounds and the environment is any type of weather. Granted, some jobs are easier than others like painting curbs, cutting grass, raising & lowering the flags, etc. You have three employees who are 60 - 65 who say this is just getting too hard for them. Now what? Do you give them the easiest tasks or do you say, "sorry, but . . . ." (you know the rest).
We have 3 more employees in this group next year. We'll have 4 more in a few years. As you might imagine, because of their age, they are near their 30 year retirement.
Thanks in advance - I know I can count on y'all.
We have 3 more employees in this group next year. We'll have 4 more in a few years. As you might imagine, because of their age, they are near their 30 year retirement.
Thanks in advance - I know I can count on y'all.
Comments
If you come up with some magical age at which you think somebody ought to be painting curbs instead of running a bush-hog all day long, then what do you do with women who claim they need a lighter duty or those with physical problems who ask "what about me?".
When you decide what to do about this one, let's figure out how to get light duty for older HR people who are exhausted from decades of it.
(If you're lucky, this will be one of these 'advanced' issues that you'll learn the answer to in D.C.)
We, of course, have the same situation, and, from a practical standpoint, their supervisor is probably not going to expect as much out of them as the other employees, but from an 'official' standpoint, they have to be able to do the job. Again, from a practical standpoint, they might know how to do the job 'better' rather than 'harder', so they may very well be able to complete their tasks as well as others.
We rely on these people for their institutional memory and experience. (Who knows what to do when 5th and Maple is flooded during a rain storm??) In addition, other employees will judge us based on how we treat these individuals after 30 years of service. It's a fine line, but the job still has to get done.
Not much help, hmm?
Don't let us pld folks get over, we should be able to contribute or decide to move on and let the younger people get the physical work done. You can bet I will leave if I can not contribute a days work for a days pay.
PORK, Old pork is better than no pork at all!!!
Pork, the weakening of the graying workforce is not an insuation. It's a fact. These employees say they cannot handle those jobs anymore.
"I bet if you let the senior citizens in your work place know that their supervisor is the responsible person and he will assign each person the appropriate task to get the jobs done. Put the power in the hands of the superviosrs and make them decide the plight of the senior work force."
You'll lose that bet. It's the supervisors who are saying, "if they can't cut it, get rid of 'em." It's 'yours truly' saying 'no' to that notion and opting to restructure some of the jobs.
"For some of us physical work is difficult but I have become smarter and less able to use my young muscles so I use my old brain and the work gets accomplished."
Your old brain must be smarter than our aged workers. Ours can't seem to look at a water main break and will it to be fixed without their young muscles.
"We should be able to contribute or decide to move on and let the younger people get the physical work done. You can bet I will leave if I can not contribute a days work for a days pay."
Well, Pork, that's you. Our crew does not think the same way. They don't contemplate leaving if they cannot contribute a days work for a days pay. They ask for alternate assignments. Unfortunately, they cannot all be given a bucket of yellow paint to paint curbs. For cryin' out loud, there would be nowhere to park.
"PORK, Old pork is better than no pork at all!!! "
I agree with your last remark. I'm sure at any age you're a productive and valued employee.