Executive Assistant
lhill
334 Posts
Our executive assistant (formerly executive secretary) is exempt. This is under the "administrative" criteria. I'm hearing some dissent as to whether this can qualify as an exempt position. She works for the GM/CEO, Board of Directors, and our attorney who is on site 2 days a week. She interprets policy and makes administrative decisions. What do you think? Is this qualified to be an exempt position, as opposed to a department secretary who is non-exempt?
Comments
Administrative Exemption
Applicable to employees who perform office or non-manual work which is directly related to the management policies or general business operations of their employer or their employer's customers, or perform such functions in the administration of an educational establishment; who regularly exercise discretion and judgment in their work; who either assist a proprietor or executive, perform specialized or technical work, or execute special assignments; who receive a salary which meets the requirements of the exemption; and who do not devote more than 20% of their time to work other than that described above (40% in retail and service establishments).
Based on this, I'd think you would want to check two additional items - determine whether she gets paid at least $455 per week (regardless of hours worked), and determine if less than 20% of her work time is doing clerical things.
Disclaimer: This message is not intended to offend or attack. It is posted as personal opinion. If you find yourself offended or uncomfortable, email me and let me know why.
If your EA is working overtime, then your company is benefitting from her being classified as Exempt, but you risk her challenge. If not working OT, then she benefits from the protections that exempt employees have of a full week's pay, versus those only paid for actual hours worked.
If OT is not an issue, you should be okay either way, but to my knowledge non-exempts rarely file FLSA lawsuits claiming they should be exempt.
Linda
She appears to also be incorrect in assuming you used the executive exemption criteria for this employee.