fumes made them sick
![njjel](http://blr-hrforums.elasticbeanstalk.com/plugins/DefaultAvatars/design/LBlueAvatar.jpg)
We had our heater serviced and the fumes from the spray paint spread throughout the building and while it was not pleasant, it did bother a few of the workers who have upper respiratory problems. One of the workers had an asthma attack from it and went home and another said it bothered her allergies and she also left. Under the law, are we obligated to pay her for the 4 hours she missed or can we tell her to use her sick time? I look at this as it is worker's comp however both workers are back to work today. So if I were treating this like worker's comp I would not pay them and neither would w.c., but they could be paid from their sick bank if they have time. Your thoughts?
Comments
Gene
BTW, depending on your business, you may be required to record this on the OSHA log as well, since they lost time.
We pay our employees from the time of the incident/event until the physician takes them out of the work force. We use a 5 work day measurement before W/C will kick in, after the physician takes a worker out of the work force. Until we can provide a healthy working environment, we are responsible for lost earning power.
By removing the unhealthy environment issue overnight the employee would return to a normal days work on the clock. You could also engineer the issue away by temporary work location for these individuals. The individuals effected by the smell could be assigned to work the yard beautification program rather than sitting at home in a "couch potato" roll at company expense. If they are not interested in working in some other opportunity then "boom" they are off the clock or on PTO, at their choice.
Be proactive to take care of the employee and you will not likely get a "telephone complaint OSHA audit"!
PORK
Edit - and would they pay for the 5 days regardless of whether the incident was caused by fumes or a fall?
Edited words are also incorporated in these words.
Pork
Regarding pay, my initial reaction was who told them they could go home and what was said about paying them. I'm with Hunter1 in that normally work-related injuries/illnesses result in medical care and, if these two had sought medical care, a doctor could have said take the rest of the day off. In that case you would have followed your policy about pay for the rest of the shift. (We pay for lost time on the day of the incident.) But these two people didn't follow the normal route, and, frankly, since they returned the next day with no problems, have saved you WC expenses. Perhaps a half hour of outside air might have gotten them through the shift, but it's over now. Pay them regular pay unless you don't pay for anybody's lost time on the day of the incident. You do seem convinced their problem was due to the fumes.
You probably dodged a bullet by only having two people go home, but what if you'd had more all saying "my head hurts, my eyes burn, my throat's sore, my little toe tingles, etc., and we all want to go home, with pay"? A Pandora's box there but yet the safety and well being of the workforce must come first.
You seem to have a lot of air quality issues. Isn't this the same group who you posted are having breathing problems in the law firm and you're seeking advice on testing air quality? Is there by any chance a bean factory in your building or maybe a Campbell's pork 'n' beans canning company downstairs?