Interns vs volunteers

I have started some research into this area to try and understand formal distinctions between interns and volunteers. In the case I am researching the interns are not paid positions. I have been on the DOL site looking for clarification but I am not getting results.
So while I continue the research project I thought I would post this and ask for some input from the forum. I know it's late on Friday afternoon for the Eastern time zone, but any clarification would be great.
So while I continue the research project I thought I would post this and ask for some input from the forum. I know it's late on Friday afternoon for the Eastern time zone, but any clarification would be great.
Comments
Volunteers in private business may cause some real nightmares if you "permit" or allow the volunteer to "suffer" work which would otherwise be paid for by the company engaged in commerce.
By statutory definition, the term "employ" includes"to suffer or permit to work." Work not requested but suffered or permitted to be performed is work time that must be paid for by the employer. Even an employee, who voluntarily continues to work at the end of the shift to finish an assigned task or to correct errors, has been permitted or allowed to suffer work and must be paid.
If yours is a community service non-profit you might be able to use volunteer efforts on the advancement of your organization's behalf, but then your organization is most likely not involved in interstate commerce.
Hope this helps.
PORK
Yes we are a non-profit and do not engage in interstate commerce. We get plenty of volunteers for various projects, including some individuals working off mandated community service.
I am clear about our relationship with a normal volunteer. We have used both paid and non-paid interns in the past. These internships have been connected with a formal course of study through a local university.
My issues come with understanding the formal relationship of an intern to the company handbook, workers compensation, and the like.
For instance, do we give them a handbook and highlight the sections that apply to them or just live with some sort of informal arrangement and let it go at that?
PORK
Workers Comp for our unpaid interns that come out of the University of Nevada is paid for by the university. If we pay the intern, we also pay the WC.
Our Exec Dir is saying that this relationship is for the student and we should expect no benefit from the relationship - which seems counter intutitive to me. Yes, we get a benefit and often if is a great deal of value. There are times when all it does is cost us valuable training and supervision time and the rewards to us are few.
I am just struggling to put this area in a box somewhere between employee and volunteer. Perhaps I need to think through it some more to see where they fit.
Your responses are great. Thanks.
Interns for short runs helps us to put someone on the development of the facts and conditions of an issue and does not take away human resources from our primary mission of producing baby pigs. Interns for the long run would be more adminstrative and primary for the benefit of the student and would be excess to our needs for daily operation. This student would be placed in our MIT (manager-in-training) program or we would not be involved. The MIT (intern) would earn $500.00 per week gross, while workinf on the job and learning. The student will be given elective credit for the the hours spent on the job and developing his/her knowledge of "pig production".
Ihope this helps you to develop an internship program that fits into your companies' over all business plan, otherwise, it would be as your senior leader says, it is only for the benefit of the student.
PORK
It has beneficial for both. Though I agree with you Marc, that sometimes the training time taken can be a pain!
I have always expected that we would get actual work from these interns, whether they are paid or not, and for the most part we have been. Our Exec Dir does get nursing students in for a very brief internship. So far their assignments have been strictly related to the nursing program they are going through with very little benefit to us. Other intern programs are clearly a win/win for the student and for us, especially those that are going through the licensed Marriage and Family Therapy programs. After these folks have been joined at the hip for a time with a supervising therapist, they go through full-on therapy with their own set of clients. Very clearly just like a full on employee. They even get paid an hourly rate after a brief introductory period.
I expect to find out more today about our Exec Dir's angst with respect to this program.
Your input is execellent as usual. I am going to print out this thread, highlight the salient points and guide our discussions through this little minefield.
Thanks again for the help.
The General Counsel received a call from a former Board Member who has a daughter on her summer break and will be starting her Junior or Senior year of law school in the Fall. He was wondering if we had any unpaid internship opportunities for a 4-6 week period. The General Counsel is interested and knows or one or two research projects she could help. However, he would like to have it be an unpaid assignment, and the student is not interested in working through a formal university program for credit.
I, like Marc, have tried searching on DOL's FLSA site to try to determine whether this is even possible, but have had no luck. After reading this thread, I'm thinking that we would have to pay this intern at least minimum wage for the work she produces.
Thoughts anyone?
PORK
Thanks for your reply. As I continued researching old threads on HR Hero I found more resources and references to actual FLSA language that does lead me to agree with you - that we cannot offer an unpaid internship because we will benefit from the relationship and it's not a pure "training" opportunity.
I appreciate you confirming it for me!
Good luck,
Dutch2