Privacy about Insurance
TanyaE
10 Posts
The president of my company wants me to find out how many employees that we have that have declined medical insurance coverage for their spouse and/or children because of exsisting coverage elseware and find out why they declined the coverage. Then he would like to know how much it would cost for these employees to get on their spouses medical coverage at their place of employment. I feel that it is none of our business why they declined coverage in the first place and I also feel that this could be dipping into the HIPPA Privacy Act laws. Is that correct? Need help and advise.
Thanks,
Frustrated in HR
Thanks,
Frustrated in HR
Comments
Also agree with the other posters who said this does not fall under HIPAA, but could be difficult to do after-the-fact.
As another poster said, in our company we do request proof of medical coverage in order for an employee to waive benefits and get the reimbursement (about $10/pay) we offer.
And personally, whether or not it is a HIPAA violation, I think employees' insurance choices and the reasons behind them are none of my business. As long as they comply with our enrollment or waiver procedures I'm happy.
There is a form that our insurance broker/carrier requires our employees to complete - it's called a "Waiver of Benefits". On the form, it asks who is not enrolling (employee, spouse & child)& the reason for not electing benefits. You may want to ask your broker/carrier for this form - I never realized it was optional for a company not to have employees fill out one out - but maybe it's different for different insurance carriers. I have a copy of the form we use if you want to send me your email address.
As to providing a monetary benefit to employees who use their spouses/domestic partner plan, my only experience with this is to say 'no' to the employees who ask for it. My reasoning is that I'm in a precarious situation, I fluctuate between 98 to 110 employees throughout the year, and I get a price break on my quotes when I have everyone fully insured and 100% participation at 100 employees. When I compare the price break to other alternatives - it quickly becomes a wash. Also, it saves potential headaches later down the road, i.e. the employee's spouse lost their job & they don't have insurance any more, or maybe at the spouse's place of business the rates when sky high for dependents and now your employee wants to get back on your insurance. These are just some of my concerns with allowing employees to waive benefits - but they may not be everyone's.
Just my thoughts.......