Unable to do Job

I need the benefit of your experience;

I have an ee that has a permanent restriction from her Doctor that makes her unable to do an essential job function (as stated in her job description). I do not have any other position to transfer her to within our organization. She doesn't meet the ADA criteria of a disability (substantially limiting major life activity). She has not filed for WC yet.

My question is do I need to find a spot for her when the only acceptable accomodation to her, and her Doctor, is to do a very limited portion of her job function?


Comments

  • 8 Comments sorted by Votes Date Added
  • Generally No. But you need to make sure that the decision that she is unable to do the job is factually based. I have seen cases where an employer says the employee can't do the job, but the job has changed because of technology or the job description says A, B, and C; but in reality, the employees only do A and B.

    I would also not count out the ADA (how can you be 100% sure she is not disabled under the ADA -- unless you know there is a case on point). Check into whether there is any accomodation (short of eliminating the function) that will allow her to do the job.

    Finally, check your organization to make sure that there are no other jobs available which she could do.

    If you have a light duty policy, or have given light duty in the past, you need to consider it for her.

    Good Luck.
  • How would you handle a disabled employee who went for surgery, is still out after six months and is having complications and can not say when they will be able to return to work? We have a six month disability leave policy.
  • [font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 09-09-02 AT 11:13AM (CST)[/font][p]Under OUR policies and procedures we would have to, regrettably, terminate. When you say disabled, I'm not sure whether you are applying the ADA definition or using it loosely. In any event, if she cannot return she is not protected by the ADA. If the ee has exhausted the maximum leave allowed by your policies, has requested no accommodation and cannot return to work and gives no indication of when she might, she is not a 'qualified individual with a disability'.
  • She has requested an extension of the leave but has not given a specific time frame for her return to work nor provided any further medical documentation. She is still hospitalized.
  • I think we can agree that she is not ADA protected since she cannot work with or without an accommodation, and she has requested none since she has no idea when she might return. There is no indication that it's work related, but, I don't think it would matter. She has obviously exhausted FMLA unless your state law has a longer one. She has no protection under your written company policies covering disability leave. I assume she has burned her personal and sick leaves. It boils down to precedents. What HAVE you done in the past and what WILL you do in the future? She is apparently at the mercy of the company and I'm sure that whatever you do will set the precedent the company will observe moving forward.
  • [font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 09-09-02 AT 04:10PM (CST)[/font][p]Don, don't be so quick to rule out ADA simply on the basis that she can't do essential functions NOW, with or without reasonable accommodation.

    Assuming she is ADA qualifed, a reasonable accommodation under ADA is a leave of absence that would allow an emplyee to return to work to perform the essential functions with or without further reasonable accommodation. Normally, such a leave would be one of the last accommodations to look at but it still needs to be looked at when all other possible accommodations won't work.

    Whether or not in this partiuclar situation a leave beyond FMLA or even beyond the 6 months (3 FMLA and 3 non-FMLA) would be reasonable or if reasonable would not cause undue hardship, is difficult to say absent specific information about this situation. But the employer can't reject the concept out of hand unless the employee isn't qualified as ADA disabled.

    Of course, the failure to provide information for the employer to make the assessment would normally render her an unqualified employee under ADA. But it is possible that the doctor may not know when she could return to work. The best thing to do is for the employer to contact the employee and her treating practictioner and put the questions (or similar questions) -- when can you return to work? If the employee/treating practitioner can't determine that now when can it be determined?

    And then start from there. If they can't give an answers to those questions, then I'd say release without prejudice. If the answer to the last question is vague, I'd give it another 30 days and try again and then if vague or no answer, terminate.

    If an answer is given establishing a date of return or one identifes a date that a final determination can be made, the employer would, of course, then have to determine whether further leave would be reasonable (assuming longer than 30 days).
  • All that aside, the employee says she cannot return to work and has no idea when she will be able to. That, by no stretch of the Act, could be 'reasonable'. Nor would it be reasonable to coast for an undefined period of time while she and her physician do decide when she might be able to return. Reasonableness has parameters and undefined time with no parameters can hardly be reasonable. Now, if the doctor said, "I will have you an answer in less than a week", that might be another matter.
  • Theresa,
    I have looked hard at the ADA guidelines and believe that I've addressed them appropriately. case in point: this individual is an assembler, she is unable to do one part of her essential job function, i.e. calibrate the unit/s she assembles. All other assemblers at our company are required and able to do this function and ropping this function would significantly change the job.

    I'll look at the light duty issue.

    thanks
Sign In or Register to comment.