Health Savings Accounts
pfroemming
4 Posts
We are switching our medical to a Health Savings Account. This is such a new area that no one really knows anything about it. According to the regs. a dependent does not qualify for the HSA if that individual can be claimed as a tax dependent of another individual. We have an employee that is divorced; she and her ex-husband alternate years claiming their child as their dependent. She pays all medical expenses for her child, the ex-husband pays child support to her. My question is - does her child qualify for the HSA?
Comments
Just a note here, even during the year in which she can not claim her child as her dependent, she can still use the money in the HSA to pay for qualified medical expenses for the child. "In general, amounts in an HSA can be used for qualified medical expenses and will be excludable from gross income even if the individual is not currently eligible for contributions to the HSA." [url]http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-04-2.pdf[/url]
Please have the ee check with her CPA/financial guru to be sure - it's all still really new.
ps - I see you're in Washington. Are you guys going through Premera, Regence or Accordia? I would also call the rep. to see if they have an answer...
So, the parent that has to cover the child for health care per the divorce paperwork, still has to do so, but they may not be able to take advantage of the HSA tax deduction if they can't claim the child that year. It works kind of like this: If I claim my son on my taxes (because he's my dependent), I also get to file as head of household & receive tax benefits for doing so. If I can't claim my son (my ex's turn to claim him as his dependent), then I can't file as head of household and must instead file as single and I therefore lose some tax benefits. It's a deduction on someone's taxes and whether or not they get to take those deductions depends on whether or not they were able to claim their child as a dependent. Does that help any?
We haven't seen our renewal yet so have no idea if we will make that move yet. I know we will have a riot on our hands because our employees have been so spoiled in the past. if this doesn't put them over the edge -- nothing will!
how have you handled "upset" employees when introducing this "benefit"???
thanks!
This has not been an easy transition. If we could have deposited more than $200/$400 for them it may have been different.
But there is no employee here that considers this a benefit, much less an improved benefit. In addition, weekly contribution will be up to $30/week.
A 2 week vacation is sounded better all the time. I start open enrollment Wednesday. Think about me!
Also, if possible, you may want to come up with a couple of scenarios to compare. For example, the costs involved in treating a broken leg under the old plan, and the cost under the new plan.
The cost of dr visits under the old plan and the cost under the new plan.
Statistics show that only about 10% of plan participants will use more than $5000 in a plan year. And, 50% of the participants will use $500 or less during the plan year.
If an employee determines how often they have gone to the dr and/or had tests, etc done during a year, they will find the premium savings will often off-set the deductible . . . besides which, they can then continue to save and use the money when needed for other incurred medical expenses.
Hope this helps.