Quick Response - Wants to drop husband from ins.

A female employee has advised me she wishes to drop her husband from her medical/dental insurance because they are separated. I'm thinking she can't do that unless they get divorced and the decree doesn't state she needs to keep him covered. Am I on the right track here?
Comments
In almost every case like this, the employee has had to come back and reinstate coverage for the spouse due to the new court order.
I do not recommend adding more tension to the already volatile situation. I would advise against terming him until the divorce is finalized.
Just my input.
Lisa
It may depend on your State. Here in Maryland, there is no definition for "legally" separated. Though being legally separated is a qualifying event, our insurance carrier will not allow the change in coverage without a document to establish the separation. This is reasonable since a spouse may move back to Mom's (therefore separated) and the couple reconciles five weeks later. In this state, one party will file for a "limited divorce" which establishes a separation agreement until one of them files for a divorce.
I would say you need more than a verbal statement from your employee that she is separated. Call your carrier and ask what document is needed to establish the qualifying event.
Employees taking someone off their insurance just because they want to is not a COBRA qualifing event - but - I always sent a COBRA letter whenever anyone came off (overly cautious, I know). In nearly all cases like this, it prompt a rather quick court action where the EMPLOYEE would then be forced to re-enroll them back to the termination date. I would inform them of the process without asking personal questions and sometimes they would change their minds after hearing it. Leave it up to them. I figured I went through my own divorce 10 years ago - I was not going to go through theirs with them too.
Remember: goozefraba, goozefraba.
Glad I could help.
But the main reason for this response is to pose the following scenario/questions. An ee, who has been beaten by her spouse, gets a court order banning the spouse from any contact with the ee to include staying away from their house. Does this ee have to continue paying for the spouse's insurance until their divorce (a qualifying event) is final? I know the spouse would qualify for COBRA at his own expense after the divorce, but it's hard to imagine the ee being forced to continue paying the insurance premiums for someone that has beaten her. Of course the spouse could voluntarily agree to pay for his share of the premium, but what if he refuses to pay and still wants to be covered? This is a real life scenario that is unfolding as we speak.
Life Status events include legal separation and divorce, at which time your employee could drop the spouse (or ex-spouse) from coverage. Otherwise, it seems to me that the employee would have to continue with 2-party coverage, paying the employee contribution amount for that level of coverage until a valid life status event occurs. I would check with legal counsel to see if a court order would also qualify as valid life status event, but not sure how it would be written.
A very sad scenario you depict. I hope your employee is doing ok.
Thanks for your input. The scenario actually involves a couple at a local company (not mine). Their HR Director (a friend) asked me for my advice. The HR Director is obviously not a "Forumite". In addition to giving him my opinion on the scenario in question, I also suggested he look into becoming a "Forumite". I believe he'll be contacting HRhero.com today in order to enroll. Thanks again!
IRS Ruling 2002-88 issued 12/30/02 answers the following question:
"If an employee cancels his/her spouse's coverage under a group healthplan in anticipation of their divorce, when is the group health plan required to make COBRA coverage available to the spouse?"
the IRS states "there is no authority under COBRA statute or regulations to require a plan to make COBRA available before the date of a qualifying event."
Didn't mean to offend you. Sorry if my inferrance of your post was off target, but you haven't changed my mind. You're toying.