identifying race
System
5,885 Posts
EEO1 time is coming up. I used to be the recruit and hire person for the one location and assist with the other location. I have since handed over those reins to Dept. Mgrs.
Th trouble is now I can't identify people's race to comply with eeoc. I know I cant't ask the employees directly but can I ask the manager?
This question makes me very uncomfortable, anybody got a simple solution?
Thanks
Th trouble is now I can't identify people's race to comply with eeoc. I know I cant't ask the employees directly but can I ask the manager?
This question makes me very uncomfortable, anybody got a simple solution?
Thanks
Comments
In California, we are required to provide an Applicant Identity Form to all job applicants (for voluntary completion ONLY plastered all over the form). This form is never attached to the application. If hired, such form is moved to an active employee category (again, never identifiable but retained for EEO-1 purposes). I believe other states permit a similar "inquiry" - again only voluntary. Using this form would enable you to have a more accurate assessment.
Thanks for reminding me EEO-1 time is coming up again.
Not that you asked (and with the whole caveat about the value of free advice), but I always recommend to my clients that they NOT include this type of information on a general information form or, indeed, any form that stays in an employee's personnel file. It is WAY too easy for a disgruntled former employee to point to the existence of this form in their file as evidence in support of their discrimination claim...
Evan
You make a good point, and it is too bad we have to go to extremes to avoid frivolous litigation. But, let me ask you this. Since we must classify all our employees on our annual AAP, how would you suggest we do it accurately and consistently from year to year? We do enter the race information from this status sheet into our personnel data base and use that generate the AAP report. If we didn't ask employees, then we would have to guess and in some cases would guess wrong. We had a single female employee (she was divorced) surnamed Sanchez I would "guess" to be Hispanic, but she was Russian. Guessing could lead to inaccurate reporting. If you underreport minorities you could be setting yourself up for a needless audit by the state EEO commission. If you overreport, you could be accused of filing false information if audited. And usually ignorance is not an accepted excuse.
BTW, any unsolicited advice is welcome.
I think this answer is suggested in other responses posted here, but just to be clear, I think that it is OK for you to ask (for the purposes that we are discussing), but that the form should be kept separately from the employee's file. There are probably many forms that you already keep separate from the employee's file for similar reasons, such as forms that contain health information. I know that having to take steps to avoid frivolous litigation is painful, but it tends to be a lot more painful to end up having to pay someone like me to defend against that litigation!
Evan
Tony Kessler, director of editorial
M. Lee Smith Publishers LLC
(615) 661-0249 ext. 8068
It is okay to ask current ee, however it is not okay require a response. Every year we would send out a statement to our ees which contained personal information such as address, ss# etc. and one of the areas ees could fill out was race. We always made the form optional and explained why we were looking for this information. We had about a 90% response. However I would not ask applicants at all. We would only ask after they were hired. The EEOC did not have a problem with our asking after the fact.
When many applicants apply electronically, it is hard to determine or guess race. I usually log them as white unless there is something distinguishing that would make me think they were a minority, such as they are from southeast asia.
A question for those who have had audits. Were they random, for reason, or do they audit all plans within a specific timeframe?
Zanne