Another supervisor problem

Let me begin by apologizing if this becomes a little long winded but I want to make sure you have enough background to provide some assistance...

We have a supervisor who has been with the company 30+ years (although not all that time in a supervisory position). He has a problem with "weak women" and by this I mean women who do not "stand up to him". Other employees have stated that when he finds a weakness, he "plays" on it. There are several women who have been put to tears because of the way he talks to him.

Although I have only been with the company 1+ year, I have found notes dating back to 1998 regarding these same type of problems. In February we made the decision to mandate he went to our EAP for supervisory training and if he refused, he would be terminated. Needless to say he went but simply "went through the motions". At that time he was also told, verbally, that any more instances of harassment would result in his termination of employment.

Yesterday I had another female employee in my office in tears regarding him. According to BOTH their stories, he went to her as she was walking back to her workstation dangling a watch in front of her and said "Here, I bought you a watch so you know what time it is and can tell when your break ends so you can get back to work". Because of other things he said to her, this reduced her to tears.

Here's the problem - at the last meeting, although documented, nothing was provided to him in writing regarding the fact that he was on a "last chance" so I'm wondering whether we should keep him on and provide him a another written last chance or go ahead and terminate and let the cards fall where they may.

We are in an at-will state but this individual is 50+ years old and has told me, in no uncertain terms, that if our company does ANYTHING he doesn't like we will be faced with an age discrimination suit. I know he has already seen an attorney because he has told others about it. Obviously we aren't going to keep him on simply based on his threats but I want to make sure we have a solid case when, not if, we receive the notice from the attorney.

I feel like we have a bomb waiting to explode - either we keep him and one of the female employees file a harassment claim (and they have enough documentation for it) or we face an age discrimination claim if we terminate him without enough solid documentation.

What would be your advice?
«1

Comments

  • 36 Comments sorted by Votes Date Added
  • Linda: You do NOT have a bomb waiting to explode. You have the fragments of a bomb that has ALREADY exploded! Based on what I read in your post, this employee should be terminated. Enough with second and third chances and refresher behavior courses and continued documentation. This man has a personality trait that will not and can not change and it is not the company's obligation to walk with him down some daisy-lined lane of counseling and behavior modification. He is an insensitive bully and a liability to the company every day that he wakes up and comes in. He has apparently perfected the 'non-art' of abusing and preying on people he perceives as weak and unable to defend themselves; otherwise some man would have wound his clock a long time ago...either a husband or a male employee, or even a woman with a Jersey-Temper! I would give absolutely no thought to his warnings about 'dealing with him'. Nobody, regardless of age or tenure, should be retained once they are identified as an abuser.
  • Here is a prime example on why documentation is necessary.
    As long as you have notes and information (document verbal warnings)
    including written warnings, he has no proof of Age Discrimination.
    I agree that this is a negative personality trait of his and that he is showing no signs of changing. Is there written documentation on is "force" to go to
    EAP??
    If you do not already have an Employment Attorney - now is the time to consult with one. In the future, I'm sure that now that you are there - any such incidents will be documented properly.
  • Linda,

    I agree with Don. This supervisor sees his 30+ years and his age protection as some kind of immunity from legal employment practices - like creating a hostile work environment. Does he treat male employees the same way? Looks like you'll have a law suit if you don't get rid of him. I hope you have the backing of other upper management.

    Good luck.

    "Sam"
  • I agree with the others. He is attempting to "hold you hostage". Don't let him.
  • I agree with the comments above indicating this individual should go. However, I would look closely at the written documentation you have on this. Hindsight is 20/20 and in retrospect would say a last chance agreement (signed) from the mandated EAP counseling would have given you the cleanest way to terminate this individual.

    In absence of that, I would prepare one now and note on there what steps have been taken in the past, the expectations going forward along with "check-in" dates with his supervisor. On the list of consequences, would clearly spell out that continued behavior of this sort will include further disciplinary action up to and including termination. Include in this that retaliation of any sort will not be tolerated and will also be grounds for dismissal. In this scenario, would recommend a witness as he may refuse to sign.

    With behavior patterns like this, the probability that he will violate it should present itself shortly. As such, you then have a clear-cut defense for a future lawsuit and protect your employees as well.
  • Linda: From your post, you have the documentation from SEVERAL incidents from different employees. Has he been spoken to each time? I think you have all you need to terminate, especially the mandated EAP. Since he has been to see a lawyer, he knows what is on the horizon. Ergo,the threat of age discrimation.

    I would take 30 seconds to terminate him (before the end of the shift), then have him escorted to his desk for his personal stuff and then walked out of the building. If you have secuirty, all the better, have them there too. Let him know what it feels like to be humiliated.
  • I don't suppose you would be lucky enough to have a qualified 50-year-old waiting in the wings to replace him...
  • Yes, and it would be even sweeter if that 50 year old in the wings could be one of those 'weak women' you referred to in your question.
  • I would like to thank you for your responses. I have drawn up a final "last chance" agreement which, hopefully, leaves no question in his mind regarding where he stands with the company. Our attorney is at this very minute reviewing it. We plan to meet with him tomorrow morning to go over this with him and upper management is currently drawing up the "separation agreement" for him as well. We anticipate it to take only a short period of time before he sticks his foot in his mouth again. The first thought was to terminate him immediately but we want to make sure any potential exposure to an age discrimination lawsuit is minimized so we are providing this last written warning.
  • I sense he's about to lift something heavy...



  • Good luck. Let us know how it went.
  • lindaS: I am 62 and have no special claim for the protection of Age Laws when my "performance" or "personal behaviors" are documented as "negative behavior" toward the employees, management, the work for which I am walking up to the pay line and drawing a paycheck, or any other employer opportunity. I must be providing "inconcert with all other employees" the work that produces a product or service and income for us all. When I allow my age and physical abilities to no longer be competitive with the other team members, then I must or the company must take the necessary steps to "right my wrongs". A cat that can be skinned in many ways. My comments or threats of retailation must be well supported and valid or I will loose "more face". So get me out of there as gently as you can with clear words written in evaluation forms or disciplinary write-ups. Make it clear that it is not my age but it is the poor work in comparsion to the production of the rest of the team. If he is not blind, he can just get mad and show his "butt", but he should be gone! I wish I was there, and I would be glad to show the old man who is now a low performer the door, with or without a "gold watch for his 30+ years" or maybe a "no thank you at all for 31+ years of service. We must always understand when it is time for us to move on! You can not worry about any defense of your company action when it is supported by failed behaviors!!! Pork
  • [font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 05-14-03 AT 06:51AM (CST)[/font][p]Linda,

    You may also want to conduct an internal investigation and get signed statements from the employees he's "reduced to tears" and any witnesses. I would also go as far as contacting ex-employees for their statements. By performing this investigation you not only give yourself the documentation you need in defense of his termination but you may be able to head off any hostile work environment suits from the women in your employ. At the very least, if you do get hit with a suit, you'll be able to prove that you took appropriate action.

    My .002 worth. Good luck.

    LFernandes
  • I think you are taking a large risk by giving this ee another opportunity to abuse a fellow ee when you really already have documentation that he is a risk... he should go now not after he stumbles one more time. While I am a firm advocate of last chance agreements this is not the correct situation for its use (more appropriate for substance abuse situations, my opinion). This employee is exhibiting a form of violence in the workplace and should have no more chances to vent his particular passion on his fellow ee's. Make him go away before he uses this time as an opportunity and hurts himself on the job or emotionally distresses another ee.

    Sometimes we err in the hope of having the perfect documentation for every situation to protect us from being sued rather than looking out for the people who look to us for support and protection. This I think is that situation.

    my .02

    Stuart
  • We had the meeting with the supervisor this morning (did NOT go well) and the supervisor is now demanding written, signed statements from the employees making the complaints against him. I informed him that I would not give him this information. He is stating that he has a right to this information under the law, something I have never heard of. I'm hoping someone can help me out. I want to maintain the confidentiality of the employees who are already afraid of him.
  • Due to the abusive nature of this employee, I would not give him any signed statements from any employee. I would simply say it had been reported to you that he had conducted himself in such and such a manner and that you had conducted an investigation and you found that he has indeed done this and you must see an immediate and permanent change in how he conducts himself in the workplace. If you do not see this change, then you will have no reason but to terminate him.

    If you give him these statements, he will probably escalate the abuse and there will be an intolerable working situation between the supervisor and these employees.
  • Do NOT give him the complaints. He has no right to review them. If he wants to see them, he will need to go to court. They are considered confidential and you do not need to turn them over to him. I would place him on administrative leave until you complete your investigation especially in light of his reaction. If it shows that the "alledged" behavior it true. Terminate him. Do not, repeat, do not be intimidated by him. He is counting on it that you will be. Also remind him that retaliation is AGAINST THE LAW and he can be terminated for it.

    Lfernandes
  • Explain to Perry Mason that you have investigated and have credible evidence to support your disciplinary actions. His responsibility is to improve his performance as directed or seek other employment. You do not have to and should not give him the information he seeks. Based on his past performace he will very likely retaliate against the individuals involved. I would keep a very close eye on this individual and at the first sign of any retaliatory behavior get him out the door before you have a suit aim at you from one of the weak ladies with a good lawyer.

    Again just my thoughts I could be wrong,
    Stuart
  • He won't make it a week, I have $0.02 to wager on that!
    DJ The Balloonman
  • If he makes it until the end of the day, I'd be surprised.
  • FYI - he has made it until the end of his day BUT has put in a request for vacation next week as well as several days this week. This request will be granted.
  • Definately use this time to your advantage...Good luck!

    LFernandes
  • I'm not sure I would have granted it. I'd have to think about that one. It's as if he saw "defeat" coming and asked your permission to cease fire and let him retreat for awhile. Can it be to your advantage? Just wondering.
  • Actually yes, his time away from the floor would be to an advantage. It gives him time to "cool off" and not put his foot in his mouth to one of the employees which would thereby cause his immediate termination. This is a very angry individual whose coping skills leave alot to be desired so getting him out of here is a good thing.
  • [font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 05-15-03 AT 12:56PM (CST)[/font][p]
    Linda,

    Let us hope that the problem supervisor will fire himself by tendering his resignation when he gets back from vacation.

    Eva



    PS I have asked our prayer brigade to say a special prayer for you.


  • I agree, it can be good for the short term, but am not optimisitic he will resign or be "cured" upon return. Anger could really be escalating during this time as well as he sits home and ruminates over it. My little red flags and gut are starting to act up on this one. I hope you have your plan ready for when he blows again. . ie security, how you are going to get him out of there get his personal stuff, etc. Just be careful and keep us posted. Good luck.
  • Wow! Been there done that bought the t-shirt and wore it home. Only when our employee asked to take some time off, she returned with a doctors note stating that receiving the disciplinary notice caused her to have chest pains. So yet another can of worms opened up.

    And yes we had enough documentation and yes she sued anyway and no she did not win, but yes it cost the company lots just because the process was long and tedious and of course lawyers are not cheap.

    Just my little say!
  • Here's an update -

    The supervisor has returned to work but has been very ineffective regarding getting work out on time, etc.. He has refused additional training with our EAP provider although has agreed to attend a management conference at the end of june. Based on his performance the past couple of weeks, we (upper management) feels that he will not be here at that time and we will send another supervisor in his place. This supervisor refuses to speak to me and will put things in my mailbox, which is attached to the front of my door, instead of coming in and handing it to me (I can see him do this through the window). Very childish!!
Sign In or Register to comment.