Conviction Verification/Emp. Application
RobertL
2 Posts
Hello all...
Recently the company I work for changed the statement in the Conviction Verification section of the employment application. In addition to listing convictions, it also wants you to list all deferred adjudications. This seems odd to me and I wanted to get your opinions. The section includes:
"...all job applicants must provide and certify their complete adult criminal conviction record. This includes any conviction and/or deferred adjudication from the age of 17 until now."
And the application states: "List ALL convictions and/or deferred adjudications, from the oldest to the most recent."
Given what I thought I knew about what deferred adjudication, this struck me as an unusual request.
I am in Texas, not sure if that makes a difference for the deferred adjudication.
Looking forward to hearing your opinions...
Robert.
Recently the company I work for changed the statement in the Conviction Verification section of the employment application. In addition to listing convictions, it also wants you to list all deferred adjudications. This seems odd to me and I wanted to get your opinions. The section includes:
"...all job applicants must provide and certify their complete adult criminal conviction record. This includes any conviction and/or deferred adjudication from the age of 17 until now."
And the application states: "List ALL convictions and/or deferred adjudications, from the oldest to the most recent."
Given what I thought I knew about what deferred adjudication, this struck me as an unusual request.
I am in Texas, not sure if that makes a difference for the deferred adjudication.
Looking forward to hearing your opinions...
Robert.
Comments
Protection of juvenile records has changed, too, and we may see further changes, such that people will have to include on their application something they did when they were twelve. I tend to think all of this makes it a little hard on applicants; I think we have people who really don't know what they're supposed to write down because they don't understand what's happened to them in the legal process.
Does that help any?
We are not allowed to make a hiring decision based on SIS. However, we are permitted to ask, because state law prohibits us from having convicted felons employed in the majority of our positions, and we've successfully argued that knowledge of an existing SIS and the ability to conduct periodic follow-up checks is a business necessity. Basically, our position is that special consideration under one law is critical if we're to avoid violating the other law.
Unfortunately, too many defense attorneys advise their clients to NOT reveal an existing SIS. We treat it as a falsification of application if they do not.
You have confirmed that this is a very gray area, but your thoughts and examples have helped me get some perspective on it.
Thanks...
Robert